• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS COBAS C111; CLINICAL CHEMISTRY ANALYZER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS COBAS C111; CLINICAL CHEMISTRY ANALYZER Back to Search Results
Model Number C111
Device Problem Incorrect Or Inadequate Test Results (2456)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 08/01/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Unique identifier (udi)# (b)(4).
 
Event Description
The customer complained that the sodium results for ise indirect na, k, ci for gen 2 results from their cobas c 111 are not correlating with the sodium results from their istat.The customer stated that they started getting discrepant results dating back to (b)(6) 2017.The customer provided the sodium, potassium, and chloride data for 71 patients.Of the data provided there is a reportable malfunction for 13 different patient¿s sodium results and 1 patient¿s sodium, potassium, and chloride result.The repeat testing was performed on an istat.The repeat testing is deemed to be correct.The initial patient data was not reported outside of the laboratory.There were no adverse events.The lot numbers and expiration dates for the sodium, potassium, and chloride electrodes were requested but not provided.A field engineering specialist has visited the customer site on multiple occasions.He has replaced multiple parts, multiple consumables, performed numerous mechanical checks, and has replaced the entire ion selective electrode unit.Following service visits the customer would perform calibration and qc all of which would pass.The customer states that the sodium results are still constantly running lower on the cobas c 111 compared to the istat.The investigation is still ongoing.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Service determined the issue is related to differences in methodology (direct vs.Indirect).All follow up testing and diagnostic checks performed passed with no further issues.The instrument is performing within specifications.It was recommended to the customer that they adhere to the centrifuge times for samples and to the maintenance schedule of the analyzer.The sodium electrode lot number is 21571527 with an expiration date that was requested but not provided.The potassium electrode lot number is 21571247 with an expiration date that was requested but not provided.The chloride electrode lot number is 21571247 with an expiration date that was requested but not provided.Customer clarified that "sample (b)(6)" matches the patient information from the initial medwatch.This event appears to be isolated in nature with no indication of a systemic failure of a roche product.The customer had had no similar complaints in the previous 12 months and the affected service part showed no abnormal trend over the past 90 days.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
In supplemental (b)(4) it was stated "the customer had no similar complaints in the previous 12 months.The original investigation statement was updated and the statement should read "the customer has had a similar complaint in the previous 12 months but this resolution is sustainable per escalation support engineer.The affected service part showed no abnormal trend over the past 90 days.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Besides the possible root cause scenario that was already mentioned in a previous supplemental report, further investigation determined another possible scenario.The chloride results recovered in the opposite direction from the sodium and potassium results.That means for example that if during the initial testing the chloride results were high while the sodium and potassium results were low, the repeat testing result for the chloride would then be low while the sodium and potassium results would then be high.Typical causes for this type of behavior include air in the sample channel, leakage current coming from the waste, or an old and/or expired reference electrode.As detailed pre-analytical information could not be provided pre-analytical factors could not be excluded.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COBAS C111
Type of Device
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY ANALYZER
Manufacturer (Section D)
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS
9115 hague road
indianapolis IN 46250 0457
Manufacturer (Section G)
ROCHE INSTRUMENT CENTER AG TEGIMENTA
forrenstrasse
na
rotkreuz 6343
SZ   6343
Manufacturer Contact
michael leslie
9115 hague road
na
indianapolis, IN 46250
3175214343
MDR Report Key6844311
MDR Text Key85094559
Report Number1823260-2017-01900
Device Sequence Number0
Product Code JGS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K071211
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Medical Technologist
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/02/2017
2 Devices were Involved in the Event: 1   2  
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/06/2017
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberC111
Device Catalogue Number04777433001
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/14/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age85 YR
-
-