• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS COBAS 8000 E 602 MODULE; IMMUNOCHEMISTRY ANALYZER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS COBAS 8000 E 602 MODULE; IMMUNOCHEMISTRY ANALYZER Back to Search Results
Model Number E602
Device Problem High Test Results (2457)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 08/18/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This event occurred in (b)(6).Unique identifier (udi)#: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
The customer complained of an erroneous result for 1 patient sample tested for elecsys ferritin (ferritin) on a cobas 8000 e 602 module.The erroneous result was not reported outside of the laboratory.The initial result was diluted 1/50 and the result from the e602 module was 22168 ng/ml.The sample was repeated by the siemens method and the result was 6689 ng/ml.The customer stated quality control (qc) results were within range prior to running the patient sample.The customer double-checked the results on (b)(6) 2017 and the patient results were similar to the results on (b)(6) 2017.Qc results were within range on both the roche system and the siemens system.There was no allegation that an adverse event occurred.The ferritin reagent lot number was 20990800 with an expiration date of 31-may-2018.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The customer did not think the roche result was wrong.The high result above the expected range fit the patient's clinical picture.The customer was confused by the difference between the roche and siemens results which were obtained approximately 3 hours apart.There were no visible clots in the sample.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The initial report stated: "the customer stated quality control (qc) results were within range prior to running the patient sample." the customer clarified this as: the customer stated quality control (qc) results were within range approximately 30 minutes after running the patient sample." a review of the customer's pre-analytical data do not suggest a handling issue.Since qc results were acceptable, a general reagent issue is not suspected.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
No issues were identified during a review of the alarm trace.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The customer provided instrument performance testing data from (b)(6) 2017.The date of event was (b)(6) 2017.The data from (b)(6) 2017 show that results for one test were out of specification.Since this data is from (b)(6) 2017, it does not reflect the current status of the instrument.A specific root cause was not identified.Additional information was requested for investigation but was not provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COBAS 8000 E 602 MODULE
Type of Device
IMMUNOCHEMISTRY ANALYZER
Manufacturer (Section D)
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS
9115 hague road
indianapolis IN 46250 0457
Manufacturer (Section G)
HITACHI HIGH TECH CORP.
882 ichige hitachinaka
na
ibaraki 312-8 504
JA   312-8504
Manufacturer Contact
michael leslie
9115 hague road
na
indianapolis, IN 46250
3175214343
MDR Report Key6854523
MDR Text Key85905726
Report Number1823260-2017-01937
Device Sequence Number0
Product Code JMG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeVM
PMA/PMN Number
K100853
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/04/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/11/2017
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberE602
Device Catalogue NumberASKU
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/21/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age63 YR
-
-