• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: UROCLAMP

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

UROCLAMP Back to Search Results
Device Problem Product Quality Problem (1506)
Patient Problem Hematuria (2558)
Event Date 08/23/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
My father has been using different incontinence clamps since his cancer prostate surgery back in 2014, he has used several brands and types of clamps (cunningham, dribblestop, wiesner and others), last month i ordered him a new clamp available on (b)(6) called uroclamp, after a few days he began bleeding when urinating.I tried to contact the company to evaluate this eval but found no contact point, i even researched the fda registered mfrs found that this device is being sold illegally in the us as they have no fda registration or listing.Please evaluate this offering as the product has several quality problems when compared to other incontinence clamps this can lead to problems just like my father's or worse.There is no registered mfr, distributor or importer for this device and this is illegal.Best regards.(b)(6).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UROCLAMP
Type of Device
UROCLAMP
MDR Report Key6857692
MDR Text Key85960382
Report NumberMW5072106
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FHA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Voluntary
Reporter Occupation Patient Family Member or Friend
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/08/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/12/2017
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date12/31/2020
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No Information
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Weight83
-
-