Initial report provided by the physician, as conveyed by manufacturer's sales representative, suggested that in post-operative films acquired approximately 100 days following the initial implantation of two superion devices there appeared to be evidence of dislodgement of the superior (l3/l4 device).The product remained in situ, and at the time there was no indication that this was a reportable event.In a telephone conversation between this reporter and the treating physician on (b)(6), the x-rays images were reviewed and it was agreed that the "dislodgement" originally observed by the physician was actually evidence of a fracture of the l4 spinous process.As a result of the determination that an injury (fracture) had occurred, the report was now considered a reportable event.Spinous process fracture is a recognized, low-level risk associated with the superion product, and its occurrence and certain risk factors associated with its likelihood are described in the labeling.
|