A review of device history record of the suspect lot indicated all parts were built to specification.The reamer in question was reviewed by the engineering department.Slight normal wear and tear from general use of the instrument is visible.The investigation concluded that the reamer is still functional and satisfies the intended purpose.There is no evidence that the reamer had actually contributed to the reported phalangeal fracture.The outcome of a case depends on several factors such as surgeon's operating technique, patient factors like age, bone density, clinical history etc., this is the first complaint of this type and arthrosurface will continue to monitor.
|