• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBY4C0415
Device Problems Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Premature Activation (1484); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012); Premature Separation (4045)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 08/16/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The product was disposed of by the hospital and is no longer available for return.Without the return of the device, the reported issue cannot be confirmed and the root cause of the problem cannot be determined.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.The hospital disposed of the device.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure to treat a pseudoaneurysm using ruby coils.During the procedure, the ruby coil unintentionally detached as it was being retracted into the lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern).Although there was no report of an adverse effect on the patient, multiple attempts have been made to gather additional information.As of 14-september-2017, no additional information is available.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery (ipda) using ruby coils.During the procedure, the physician attempted to retract a ruby coil back into a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern) to reposition it.However, the physician felt resistance retracting and the ruby coil unintentionally detached near the hub of the lantern.The physician removed the pusher wire and injected contrast into the lantern, thinking that the coil implant had been removed with the pusher wire.Consequently, the ruby coil was flushed into the patient, and the physician therefore made a second puncture below the sheath and used a snare device to retrieve the ruby coil.The procedure was completed using additional coils and a new microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Please note that the following sections are being updated based on additional information provided by a penumbra sales representative on 09/26/2017: patient identifier, age at time of event and age unit, sex, adverse event and/or product problem, outcomes attributed to adverse event (select all that apply), describe event or problem, phone, date received by manufacturer (mm/dd/yyyy), type of reportable event, if follow-up, what type?.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
MDR Report Key6865705
MDR Text Key86160519
Report Number3005168196-2017-01549
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548013176
UDI-Public00814548013176
Combination Product (y/n)Y
PMA/PMN Number
K120330
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,08/16/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/14/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRBY4C0415
Device Lot NumberF74577
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received09/26/2017
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age73 YR
-
-