TERUMO MEDICAL CORPORATION 6F ANGIO-SEAL EVOLUTION VASCULAR CLOSURE DEVICE, US; DEVICE, HEMOSTASIS, VASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number C610134 |
Device Problems
Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Device Inoperable (1663); Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906)
|
Patient Problems
Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 08/21/2017 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The actual device was not returned for evaluation.The investigation is currently ongoing.A follow up report will be submitted once the investigation is complete.A review of the device history record of the involved product/lot # combination was conducted with no relevant findings.A search of the complaint file found one other report with the involved product code/lot# combination.See mdr 2243441-2017-00122 for patient one & 2243441-2017-00123 for patient two.All available information has been placed on file in quality assurance at the manufacturing facility for appropriate tracking, trending and follow-up.
|
|
Event Description
|
The user facility reported a tamping mechanism issue when using the involved device.Follow up communication with the user facility reported: on three different patients the reported lot number/angioseal device all had issues.The tapinot tube didn't function on one, the real mechanism failed on the other and the cologen plug fell out of the other angioseal.All three patients were reported to be stable.Successful outcomes from the procedures.Additional information was received on 8/24/17 update: it was reported that the device came out of the artery (along with the foot pedal/collagen plug) as they were deploying the vcd.It was reported that it didn't actually "fall out" as first reported.The whole device came out when it was being deployed.The complete vcd came out.It was used post peripheral arterial disease interventional case.A pre deployment angiograph was performed.Hemostasis was achieved by manual compression.The patient was reported to be stable.The procedure outcome was reported to be successful.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted as follow up no.1.The actual device was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, the investigation was based on the user facility information and the device history records.No evaluation could be conducted due to the device not being returned.With no device return the exact cause of the reported event cannot be definitively determined based on the available information.There is no evidence that this event was related to a device defect or malfunction.The exact cause of the reported event cannot be definitively determined based on the available information.All available information has been placed on file in quality assurance at the manufacturing facility for appropriate tracking, trending and follow-up.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|