The customer contacted the siemens customer care center (ccc).The customer's quality controls were within the acceptable ranges on both days.A siemens customer service engineer (cse) was dispatched to the customer site.The cse performed visual protocol, verified and adjusted reagent and sample probe calibrations, because the rings were off.The cse adjusted the sample probe reference voltage.Then the operator ran qc, resulting out of specification.The operator recalibrated the reagent and sample probes.The operator reran qc, resulting satisfactory.At the customer's request, the cse returned on site and performed preventive maintenance service.The cse ran patient samples, of which, the first few results were erroneous and the instrument flagged volume checks.The cse noticed splatter around the wash cup and replaced the defective probe assembly reagent with tubing and syringe.The cse reran the samples and precision, resulting satisfactory.The cse ran quality control (qc), resulting within range.The cause of the discordant, falsely elevated ee2 result is unknown.The instrument is performing according to specifications.No further evaluation of the device is required.
|
A discordant, falsely elevated enhanced estradiol (ee2) result was obtained on a patient sample on an advia centaur cp instrument.The discordant result was reported to the physician(s) who questioned it.The sample was repeated the next day on the same instrument, resulting lower.The patient was redrawn and tested, and the result matched the original sample repeat.The original sample repeat result was reported to the physician(s).There are no reports of patient intervention or adverse health consequences due to the discordant, falsely elevated ee2 result.
|