• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: 3M INFECTION PREVENTION 3M DEFIB PADS; CONDUCTIVE GEL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

3M INFECTION PREVENTION 3M DEFIB PADS; CONDUCTIVE GEL Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problems Failure to Conduct (1114); Electrical /Electronic Property Problem (1198); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems Cardiac Arrest (1762); Death (1802); Sudden Cardiac Death (2510)
Event Date 08/24/2017
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
No lot number was provided.Without lot number you can not determine expiration date or manufacturer date.This complaint is linked to 2110898-2017-00130.Since a different product was used and replaced the product used under this complaint.2110898-2017-00130 used 2345n and this complaint 2110898-2017-00131 used 2346n.The patient was the same.The information received indicated four shocks were give within 20 minutes but it was not clear how many shocks used 2345n and 2346n.Product 2345n under this complaint was not returned.This is a very rare occurrence and event.Investigation is ongoing.
 
Event Description
A male patient in cardiac arrest underwent defibrillated using 3m defib pads (consisting of electro conductive gel).There was no sign of electric conductivity during second or third defibrillation nor a response from the patient.Patient subsequently died.It was confirmed the defibrillators used with these specific defibs pads worked according to the manufacturer's specifications.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
There was no lot number given nor was the product used returned.It is difficult to review product release data to make sure product involved in the reported incident met all its release criteria.Based on review of complaints for two years there has only been one report of this type of event for this specific model and it is this one being submitted to fda.However, the hospital biomed engineer indicated the hardware including defib pads were examined and functioned in the correct way.The method used was not disclosed but the assumption is they may have performed a visual and touch for wetness regarding the defib pads.This report is linked to 2110898-2017-00130 for it involved the same patient but the use of a different model product and one that did include a specific reported lot number.The evidence of that complaint confirm product met specification and was conductive.End of report.
 
Event Description
New information: it was reported that the patient was given two shocks using the same pads with two different defibrillators.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
3M DEFIB PADS
Type of Device
CONDUCTIVE GEL
Manufacturer (Section D)
3M INFECTION PREVENTION
2510 conway avenue
st. paul MN 55144
Manufacturer (Section G)
3M COMPANY BROOKINGS
601 22nd ave south
brookings SD 57006
Manufacturer Contact
linda johnsen
2510 conway ave
st. paul, MN 55144
6517374376
MDR Report Key6896043
MDR Text Key87439238
Report Number2110898-2017-00131
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LDD
UDI-Device Identifier30707387284740
UDI-Public30707387284740
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
PRE-AMEND
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/03/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/26/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue Number2346N
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received09/27/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
Patient Age24 YR
Patient Weight35
-
-