|
Catalog Number 02.027.036S |
Device Problem
Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 09/11/2017 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).(b)(6).Device is not distributed in the united states, but is similar to device marketed in the usa.The device was received, the investigation could not be completed, and no conclusion could be drawn, as product is entering the complaint system.Device history record (dhr): 02.027.036s / l512064.Manufacturing location: (b)(4).Manufacturing date: 09.Aug.2017 expiry date: 01.Aug.2027.No ncrs were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Device report from synthes europe reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that it was not possible to tighten the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (pfna) blade after the insertion.For the unlocking the key for the blade was used.The blade is still in the hospital for decontamination.Surgery was successfully completed with another pfna blade and a prolongation of 15 minutes.No further surgery is required.Concomitant parts: 1x key for pfna blade, 356.832/ lot unknown; 1x impactor f/pfna blade, 03.010.410 / lot unknown; 1x pfna blade, perforated, l 105mm, 02.027.036s / lot unknown.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product development investigation was completed.A visual inspection, device history records review and function test were performed as part of this investigation.The returned pfna blade does not show any obvious damage.The inside sleeve is too wide unscrewed as received.The present pfna blade was analyzed for conformance to print specifications as well as the device history record was researched; no abnormal findings were identified.Manufacturing and inspection records indicated no problems with the lot in question.After the inner threaded sleeve (hexagon socket) screwed in original position as mounted, a function test was performed and the device was functional as required.Based on these findings we conclude that the cause of failure is not due to any manufacturing non-conformances.We can only assume that the blade was not correctly connected to the instrument, as the position of the inside sleeve confirmed.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|