• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TERUMO MEDICAL CORP. GLIDESHEATH ACCESS KIT; HYDROPHILIC COATED INTRODUCER SHEATH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TERUMO MEDICAL CORP. GLIDESHEATH ACCESS KIT; HYDROPHILIC COATED INTRODUCER SHEATH Back to Search Results
Model Number 30-1060
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Inadequate Pain Relief (2388); Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 12/23/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The design of the sheath/ guidewire allows for the complete insertion of the wire through the one way valve.On (b)(6) 2017: right humerus imaging: "apparent retained guide projects over the proximal right arm and right lung apex." on (b)(6) 2016: diagnostic cardiac cath.On (b)(6) 2017: patient reported unbearable pain right arm.On (b)(6) 2017: femoral and peripheral angiography, foreign body removal.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GLIDESHEATH ACCESS KIT
Type of Device
HYDROPHILIC COATED INTRODUCER SHEATH
Manufacturer (Section D)
TERUMO MEDICAL CORP.
950 elkton blvd.
elkton MD 21921
MDR Report Key6903577
MDR Text Key87860779
Report NumberMW5072525
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DYB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Voluntary
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/12/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/29/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator No Information
Device Model Number30-1060
Device Catalogue Number30-1060
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/12/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No Information
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age70 YR
Patient Weight66
-
-