• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: KANEKA CORPORATION LACRIFAST; LACRIMAL STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

KANEKA CORPORATION LACRIFAST; LACRIMAL STENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number LF2-R105
Device Problems Material Puncture/Hole (1504); Material Separation (1562); Use of Device Problem (1670); Device Handling Problem (3265)
Patient Problem Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 09/07/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The concerned device "lacrifast" is not distributed in u.S under this device name, but is identical to the device "lacriflow lacrimal stent" distributed in us under 510(k) # k120886.The actual device used was returned and investigated: there was a hole, from where the bougie was thought to penetrate out, in the sidewall of the tube (colored in blue) where a stainless steel ring was mounted, and the ring was dismounted and missing.The ring's whereabouts was not confirmed during the procedure in this eye clinic, and accordingly, the missing stainless steel ring might have been remaining in the patient body.As a possible cause of the penetration of the bougie and dropping off the ring during the use, we speculate as follows: when the doctor tried to insert and advance the tube with the bougie inserted forcibly in the occluded lacrimal duct, excessive mechanical force was loaded on the ring and the distal tip of the tube where the ring was mounted, and further pushing the bougie resulted in dismounting the ring and penetration of the bougie with the ring out of the tube.
 
Event Description
This device (lacrifast) was employed to treat the epiphora due to lacrimal duct obstruction.The doctor inserted one of the lacrimal duct tube (colored in blue) into the lacrimal duct.While advancing the tube, the doctor felt that the bougie penetrated out of the tube and retrieved it out of the patient's lacrimal duct.When the actual device used was investigated, the ring was dismounted and missing.The ring's whereabouts was not confirmed during the procedure in this eye clinic, and accordingly, the missing stainless steel ring might have been remaining in the patient body.He used another lacrifast and completed the operation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LACRIFAST
Type of Device
LACRIMAL STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
KANEKA CORPORATION
2-3-18
nakanoshima, kita-ku
osaka, osaka 530-8 288
JA  530-8288
Manufacturer Contact
kazuhiko inoue
2-3-18
nakanoshima,kita-ku
osaka, osaka 530-8-288,
JA   530-8288,
31814120
MDR Report Key6909929
MDR Text Key88223710
Report Number3009761573-2017-00003
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OKS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/07/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/03/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2019
Device Catalogue NumberLF2-R105
Device Lot NumberKP026313
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/27/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/01/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age66 YR
-
-