(b)(4).Results: the penumbra system ace 68 reperfusion catheter (ace68) was kinked approximately 17.0 cm from the hub and had multiple consecutive kinks beginning approximately 120.0 cm from the hub.There were no visible wires protruding from the ace68, nor was there visible damage to the inner catheter shaft coil.During functional analysis, a 0.068¿ mandrel was inserted into the ace68, but could not be advanced pass the kink located approximately 17.0 cm from the hub.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned device revealed that it was kinked in the proximal shaft and had multiple consecutive kinks in the distal shaft.The distal kinks likely occurred due to forceful retraction of the non-penumbra stent retriever against resistance.The proximal kink may have occurred due to forceful handling of the ace68 during withdrawal of the non-penumbra stent retriever.The non-penumbra stent retriever mentioned in the complaint was not returned for evaluation, and the root cause of the initial resistance experienced during retraction could not be determined.However, if substantial clot is captured within a stent retriever, it may cause difficulty when attempting to withdraw the stent retriever through the ace68.There were no visible wires protruding from the ace 68.Penumbra catheters are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
|
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure using a penumbra system ace 68 hi-flow kit (kit).During the procedure, the physician made one pass using a non-penumbra stent retriever through the penumbra system ace 68 reperfusion catheter (ace68).While retracting the stent retriever into the ace68, the physician encountered resistance and decided to remove both of the devices as system.Upon removal and examination of the devices, a small wire from the inside of the ace68 was found to be stuck to the stent retriever and continued to pull from inside the ace68.The procedure ended at this point because the thrombus had been removed with one pass.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|