• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM ACE 68 HI-FLOW KIT; NRY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM ACE 68 HI-FLOW KIT; NRY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 5MAXACE068KIT
Device Problems Entrapment of Device (1212); Physical Resistance (2578); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 08/30/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Results: the penumbra system ace 68 reperfusion catheter (ace68) was kinked approximately 17.0 cm from the hub and had multiple consecutive kinks beginning approximately 120.0 cm from the hub.There were no visible wires protruding from the ace68, nor was there visible damage to the inner catheter shaft coil.During functional analysis, a 0.068¿ mandrel was inserted into the ace68, but could not be advanced pass the kink located approximately 17.0 cm from the hub.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned device revealed that it was kinked in the proximal shaft and had multiple consecutive kinks in the distal shaft.The distal kinks likely occurred due to forceful retraction of the non-penumbra stent retriever against resistance.The proximal kink may have occurred due to forceful handling of the ace68 during withdrawal of the non-penumbra stent retriever.The non-penumbra stent retriever mentioned in the complaint was not returned for evaluation, and the root cause of the initial resistance experienced during retraction could not be determined.However, if substantial clot is captured within a stent retriever, it may cause difficulty when attempting to withdraw the stent retriever through the ace68.There were no visible wires protruding from the ace 68.Penumbra catheters are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure using a penumbra system ace 68 hi-flow kit (kit).During the procedure, the physician made one pass using a non-penumbra stent retriever through the penumbra system ace 68 reperfusion catheter (ace68).While retracting the stent retriever into the ace68, the physician encountered resistance and decided to remove both of the devices as system.Upon removal and examination of the devices, a small wire from the inside of the ace68 was found to be stuck to the stent retriever and continued to pull from inside the ace68.The procedure ended at this point because the thrombus had been removed with one pass.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SYSTEM ACE 68 HI-FLOW KIT
Type of Device
NRY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key6914879
MDR Text Key88232190
Report Number3005168196-2017-01719
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NRY
UDI-Device Identifier00814548016603
UDI-Public00814548016603
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K161640
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/11/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/05/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date03/19/2020
Device Catalogue Number5MAXACE068KIT
Device Lot NumberF75086
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/21/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/11/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/20/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-