• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS 20GA, ACCUCATH IV CATHETER, 2.25", BASIC; INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS 20GA, ACCUCATH IV CATHETER, 2.25", BASIC; INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number AC0202250
Device Problems Break (1069); Flushing Problem (1252); Physical Resistance (2578); Device Or Device Fragments Location Unknown (2590)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 09/14/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The manufacturer has received the sample and will evaluate.Results are expected soon.A lot history review (lhr) review is not possible, as no manufacturing lot number has been provided by the complainant.
 
Event Description
Facility reported to the sales rep that during placement the coiled tip of the guidewire broke off inside the patient.It was stated by the healthcare professional (hcp) that the needle was visible, the wire was advanced, then catheter placed without difficulty.The hcp was able to get blood return; retraced needle.Hcp met resistance with the guidewire.Tugged slightly and noticed when the guidewire was removed the coiled tip of the wire was missing.Hcp was unable to flush; catheter was removed.Another device was used in a different location without any issues.The hcp compared the wire tips and realized the coiled tip was in fact missing from the initial device placed.X-ray of the arm is pending.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a damaged guidewire was confirmed and the cause appeared to be use-related.The product returned for evaluation was two accucath peripheral iv catheter assemblies.Both assemblies were received with the needles retracted into the housings.One 20ga accucath catheter was also received.The catheter had been dissected into several segments and was received adhered to an adhesive dressing.Inspection of the first sample (sample 1) revealed a break in the guidewire proximal of the coil tip.Inspection of the second sample (sample 2) was unremarkable.Microscopic inspection of sample 2 confirmed the wire to be intact.Microscopic inspection of sample 1 confirmed a break in the guidewire.The distal tip including the preformed coil was not returned for evaluation.The wire exhibited a sharp bend in the vicinity of the break.The break surface exhibited a region of increased luster.Microscopic inspection of the needle bevel revealed mechanical damage.The sharp bend and increased luster were consistent with shearing type damage.Such damage can occur if the guidewire is withdrawn against the edge of a sharp object such as the introducer needle bevel.The product ifu states ¿do not force or retract the guidewire.Retracting the guidewire may increase the risk of guidewire damage.If the guidewire must be retracted, remove the entire device to prevent the needle from damaging or shearing the guidewire.¿ a lot history review (lhr) review is not possible, as no manufacturing lot number has been provided by the complainant.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Facility reported to the sales rep that during placement the coiled tip of the guidewire broke off inside the patient.It was stated by the healthcare professional (hcp) that the needle was visible, the wire was advanced, then catheter placed without difficulty.The hcp was able to get blood return; retraced needle.Hcp met resistance with the guidewire.Tugged slightly and noticed when the guidewire was removed the coiled tip of the wire was missing.Hcp was unable to flush; catheter was removed.Another device was used in a different location without any issues.The hcp compared the wire tips and realized the coiled tip was in fact missing from the initial device placed.X-ray of the arm is pending.9/15/2017 - additional information reported that the coiled tip of the guidewire broke off and stuck in the patient.The physician was not able to remove it.11/20/2017 - sales representative confirmed that the guidewire fragment was successfully removed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
20GA, ACCUCATH IV CATHETER, 2.25", BASIC
Type of Device
INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS
605 n. 5600 w.
salt lake city UT 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas
MX  
Manufacturer Contact
teresa johnson
605 n. 5600 w.
salt lake city, UT 84116
8015225435
MDR Report Key6919201
MDR Text Key88375089
Report Number3006260740-2017-01789
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FOZ
UDI-Device Identifier00801741110948
UDI-Public(01)00801741110948
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K153298
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,user f
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/14/2017,02/15/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/05/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberAC0202250
Device Catalogue NumberAC0202250
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/28/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA09/14/2017
Distributor Facility Aware Date09/14/2017
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer11/03/2017
Date Manufacturer Received11/20/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Disability;
Patient Age27 YR
-
-