(b)(4).(b)(6).As of this date, the device has not been returned for evaluation; therefore, the reported condition cannot be confirmed and/or duplicated.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
It was reported from (b)(6) that during an unspecified surgical procedure of the spine, it was discovered that the motor device was not working.It was reported that the event occurred during use on a patient.It was not reported if there were any delays in the surgical procedure or if a spare device was available.There was patient involvement reported.It was not reported if there were any injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.
|
This device was returned for service; however, did not meet manufacturing specifications during pre-repair assessment.During repair, it was determined that the reported condition was confirmed.It was determined that the cable/cord/wiring was damaged.It was observed that no test run was possible, the failure e9 was displayed, the motor and control unit were defective, the hose was damaged and the coupling was worn out.It was further determined that the device failed pretest for loctite and cable assessments, cutter lock assessment, motor thermistor assessment, rotational speed assessment, noise assessment, air pump assessment, handpiece temperature assessment and hand control assessment.The assignable root cause was determined to be due to improper handling, which is user error, misuse, and / or abuse.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.
|