The device has not been returned to the manufacturer, at this time, for evaluation.A lot history review (lhr) of rebq0963 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.Device, not yet returned.
|
The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, frequency analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint that the dilator and sheath were difficult to split was unconfirmed.The reported problem could not be reproduced.One 4.5 fr x 5cm microintroducer was returned for investigation.The dilator was received within and treaded onto the sheath.No damage or defects were observed on the sample.Nothing remarkable was observed when the dilator hub was unthreaded from the sheath tabs.The dilator was removed from the sheath without any resistance.Skiving was present between the sheath tabs.The sheath tabs were split without difficulty and the sheath peeled uniformly and without resistance.Since the reported problem could not be replicated with a functional test, the complaint was unconfirmed.A lot history review (lhr) of rebq0963 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
|