• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ALCON RESEARCH, LTD. - IRVINE TECHNOLOGY CENTER INFINITI VISION SYSTEM; UNIT, PHACOFRAGMENTATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ALCON RESEARCH, LTD. - IRVINE TECHNOLOGY CENTER INFINITI VISION SYSTEM; UNIT, PHACOFRAGMENTATION Back to Search Results
Model Number V3.0
Device Problems Use of Incorrect Control/Treatment Settings (1126); Failure to Cut (2587)
Patient Problem Capsular Bag Tear (2639)
Event Date 09/20/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation including root cause analysis is in progress.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
A customer reported that during a combined cataract procedure the patient experienced a posterior capsule tear in the right eye.An anterior vitrectomy was required and performed using another system.When the surgeon tried to use the vitreous cutter with the second system it did not cut.It was noted the system was set up for a 20 ga vitrectomy; however the staff had selected a 23 ga vitrectomy probe cutter.The case was completed.Additional information was requested and received.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This is a (b)(6) year old male patient scheduled for surgery in the right eye (od).The primary issue reported was that the posterior capsule tore (pc tear) during a phaco procedure with an infiniti vision system.This resulted in the surgeon performing a vitrectomy (with the another system) to alleviate the pc tear issue.This is when the secondary issue was reported.The secondary issue reported was ¿the staff set up a 23g anterior vitrector.However, the device would not cut when placed in the eye.And the issue caused a delay of 1.5 hours, without harm to the patient.The company representative reviewed the set up that the staff had followed, and it appeared that they had left the device set up for a 20g prove rather than for a 23g cutter, resulting in a non-functioning cutter.Posterior capsule (pc) tear is a potential consequence of cataract extraction by phacoemulsification.Predisposition to pc tear or zonular dehiscence can be influenced by many factors including, but not limited to, congenital posterior lenticonus, posterior sub capsular (psc) cataract, poor visibility secondary to patients comorbidity [ie.Dense arcus, pterygium, band keratopathy, corneal scars, interstitial keratitis], poor microscope illumination [red reflex], ergonomic obstacles, limited intraocular working space, abnormally long or short axial lengths, pseudoexfoliation, zonular laxity, poor dilation, intraoperative floppy iris syndrome (ifis), dense cataracts, asteroid hyalosis, or inadvertent patient movement.The conditions that increase the risk of pc tear during phacoemulsification include ergonomic obstacles, limited intraocular working space, poor visualization, increased nuclear size and density, weakened zonule, a radial tear in the capsulorhexis, and an inability to rotate the nucleus or epinucleus.These conditions may arise either because of the ocular anatomy, or because of surgical technique.There is no evidence contained within the reported information at this time that indicates that the design or performance of the system had any effect on the integrity of the posterior capsule.The root cause of the primary issue of (pc tear) cannot be determined conclusively.However, the second reported issue (cutting issues) are attributed to user error.The system was manufactured on february 6, 2013.Based on qa assessment, the product met specifications at the time of release.The vitrectomy probe was not returned for evaluation; therefore, the condition of the product could not be verified.No lot number was identified with this complaint; therefore, a lot number history review could not be conducted.All vitrectomy probes are 100% visually inspected and tested for actuation, aspiration, and cut during manufacturing.The root cause of the reported event cannot be determined conclusively.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INFINITI VISION SYSTEM
Type of Device
UNIT, PHACOFRAGMENTATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
ALCON RESEARCH, LTD. - IRVINE TECHNOLOGY CENTER
15800 alton parkway
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
ALCON RESEARCH, LTD. - IRVINE TECHNOLOGY CENTER
15800 alton parkway
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
nadia bailey
6201 south freeway
mail stop ab2-6
fort worth, TX 76134
8176152230
MDR Report Key6944943
MDR Text Key89264272
Report Number2028159-2017-04051
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HQC
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
K120912
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/12/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/12/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberV3.0
Device Catalogue Number8065752160
Other Device ID NumberASKU
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/18/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/06/2013
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age65 YR
-
-