This is a (b)(6) year old male patient scheduled for surgery in the right eye (od).The primary issue reported was that the posterior capsule tore (pc tear) during a phaco procedure with an infiniti vision system.This resulted in the surgeon performing a vitrectomy (with the another system) to alleviate the pc tear issue.This is when the secondary issue was reported.The secondary issue reported was ¿the staff set up a 23g anterior vitrector.However, the device would not cut when placed in the eye.And the issue caused a delay of 1.5 hours, without harm to the patient.The company representative reviewed the set up that the staff had followed, and it appeared that they had left the device set up for a 20g prove rather than for a 23g cutter, resulting in a non-functioning cutter.Posterior capsule (pc) tear is a potential consequence of cataract extraction by phacoemulsification.Predisposition to pc tear or zonular dehiscence can be influenced by many factors including, but not limited to, congenital posterior lenticonus, posterior sub capsular (psc) cataract, poor visibility secondary to patients comorbidity [ie.Dense arcus, pterygium, band keratopathy, corneal scars, interstitial keratitis], poor microscope illumination [red reflex], ergonomic obstacles, limited intraocular working space, abnormally long or short axial lengths, pseudoexfoliation, zonular laxity, poor dilation, intraoperative floppy iris syndrome (ifis), dense cataracts, asteroid hyalosis, or inadvertent patient movement.The conditions that increase the risk of pc tear during phacoemulsification include ergonomic obstacles, limited intraocular working space, poor visualization, increased nuclear size and density, weakened zonule, a radial tear in the capsulorhexis, and an inability to rotate the nucleus or epinucleus.These conditions may arise either because of the ocular anatomy, or because of surgical technique.There is no evidence contained within the reported information at this time that indicates that the design or performance of the system had any effect on the integrity of the posterior capsule.The root cause of the primary issue of (pc tear) cannot be determined conclusively.However, the second reported issue (cutting issues) are attributed to user error.The system was manufactured on february 6, 2013.Based on qa assessment, the product met specifications at the time of release.The vitrectomy probe was not returned for evaluation; therefore, the condition of the product could not be verified.No lot number was identified with this complaint; therefore, a lot number history review could not be conducted.All vitrectomy probes are 100% visually inspected and tested for actuation, aspiration, and cut during manufacturing.The root cause of the reported event cannot be determined conclusively.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|