The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer, at this time, for evaluation.A lot history review (lhr) of reav2063 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
|
The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, frequency analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a leak in the catheter was confirmed and the cause appears to be an inadvertent puncture with a sharp instrument.The proximal segment of a 23cm equistream catheter was returned for investigation.The catheter had been cut 0.5cm distal to the cuff and the distal catheter segment was not returned for investigation.The catheter exhibited evidence of use.Residue was embedded within the cuff fibers.The bifurcation was discolored yellow.The extension legs exhibit deformation from clamping.Debris was observed on the clamps and the connectors.A functional test of the catheter confirmed a leak 0.5mm distal to the molded bifurcation when the venous lumen was pressurized with water.The leak site revealed a chevron shaped slit in the tubing just distal to the bifurcation.Sharp edges were observed along the length of the slit, which is consistent with sharp instrument damage.Due to the condition of the returned catheter, it appeared that the device was damaged while in use.A lot history review (lhr) of reav2063 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
|