Based on the details of the case provided by the local sales representative and the hospital staff, there is no indication that the flash mini balloon did not perform as intended.The likely root cause for this incident was oversizing of the balloon diameter relative to the diameter of the target vessel/stent.The balloon to vessel ratio in this case, 1.5 (4.5mm / 3.0mm), is known to significantly increase the risk for vessel dissection.It is also noted that the calcification of the patient's rca further increased the risk of dissection in this procedure.In addition to the case details, ostial corporation reviewed the manufacturing documentation and lot release testing associated with the device lot used during the procedure.No issues were noted that would have contributed to the reported incident.The instructions for use for the product were also reviewed and it was verified that vessel dissection is listed as a potential complication associated with the procedure and that the user is clearly instructed to appropriately match the balloon diameter to the diameter of the vessel/stent being treated.
|
The following information regarding the reported event was obtained from the hospital and local sales representatives: the patient was admitted to the er and then taken to the cath lab for treatment of stemi.The physician deployed a 3.0mm diameter stent in a calcified chronic total occlusion of the rca and then requested a flash device for use in post-dilation of the stent.The cath lab did not have any 3.0mm diameter flash devices at the time, only a 4.5mm diameter flash device was available.The physician decided to use the higher diameter 4.5mm diameter flash device to post dilate the 3.0mm stent.Following inflation of the flash device, a dissection occurred and the vessel shut down.Cpr was immediately started; however, the patient subsequently expired.
|