• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS; NIP

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS; NIP Back to Search Results
Catalog Number PAH101502E
Device Problem Crack (1135)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 09/28/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The manufacturing records verified that this lot met all pre-release specifications.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
The patient was presented with an aneurysm in the right popliteal artery which was intended to be treated with a gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis.An antegrade approach was used where the medical device was inserted through a 12fr introducer sheath and advanced over a 0.035 guidewire to the target lesion.It was reported to gore that when medical device deployment was initiated, some force was experienced while the proximal portion of the endoprosthesis was tried to be deployed.Based on the experienced deployment difficulties a validation of the deployment status of the device verified that the deployment line was broken and that the proximal portion of the endoprosthesis remained constrained on the catheter.It was reported to gore that several attempts were made to expedite the deployment of the endoprosthesis.Firstly the delivery catheter of the endoprosthesis was tried to be moved to force the deployment.This attempt remained unsuccessfully.Secondly a ptca balloon catheter was inserted over a 0.014 guidewire close to the constrained portion of the endoprosthesis to force deployment.Also this attempt remained unsuccessfully.Thirdly it was tried to cannulate the constrained portion without any success.Fourthly the delivery catheter was cut outside of the 12fr introducer sheath and a smaller sheath was inserted with the unsuccessful attempt to remove the partial deployed endoprosthesis from the patient¿s vessel.Finally the partial deployed endoprosthesis was retrieved into the proximal superficial femoral artery by using a snare device where the device was surgically removed.It was stated that the lesion was repaired with a patch.The procedure was successfully completed by implanting two gore® viabahn® endoprostheses.It was stated that the second gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis was needed to be implanted in order to treat a vessel dissection which occurred based on the deployment difficulties of the first used medical device.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Engineering evaluation: the device was returned in three separate pieces: the distal shaft with a partially deployed endoprosthesis still mounted, part of the proximal catheter, and the deployment line attached to the deployment knob.It was reported in the additional information that the delivery system was cut and stent wire were damaged due to surgical removal.Approximately 12.7cm of the endoprosthesis was fully expanded.Approximately 8mm of the endoprosthesis was constrained by the inner braided constraining line.The inner braided constraining line was compressed.Approximately 7mm of the endoprosthesis was partially expanded.There were multiple strut rows in the middle of the expanded endoprosthesis that appeared to be detached from the endoprosthesis.The body tape on these strut rows appeared to be displaced.The strut rows at the start of the expanded proximal end of the endoprosthesis appeared to be detached from the endoprosthesis.The body tape on these strut rows appeared to be displaced.The first strut row from the proximal end of the device appeared to be outwardly bent.In the 15mm of the endoprosthesis that was not fully expanded, the nitinol wire was disrupted.There appeared to be 5 single strands of the deployment line at the proximal end of the endoprosthesis attached to the braided constraining line.The single strands had measurements of approximately 25mm, 10mm, 10mm, 4mm, and 3mm.The dual lumen catheter was attached to the transition and a small portion of the distal shaft.The other end of the catheter appeared frayed and torn.The catheter measured to approximately 26.5cm.There were seven pairs of crimping markings on the catheter.There was approximately 212cm of deployment line (including the single fibers) attached to the deployment knob.There were three single fibers at the end of the deployment line and they measured to approximately 60mm, 10mm, and 7mm.There was a single knot in the deployment line approximately 28cm from the deployment knob.Based on the device examination performed, no manufacturing anomalies were identified.Manufacturing plant was corrected.Event description was updated.
 
Event Description
The patient was presented with an aneurysm in the right popliteal artery which was intended to be treated with a gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis.An antegrade approach was used where the medical device was inserted through a 12fr introducer sheath and advanced over a 0.035 guidewire to the target lesion.It was reported to gore that when medical device deployment was initiated, some resistance was experienced while the proximal portion of the endoprosthesis was tried to be deployed.Based on the experienced deployment difficulties a validation of the deployment status of the device verified that the deployment line was broken and that the proximal portion of the endoprosthesis remained constrained on the catheter.It was reported to gore that several attempts were made to expedite the deployment of the endoprosthesis.Firstly the delivery catheter of the endoprosthesis was tried to be moved to force the deployment.This attempt remained unsuccessfully.Secondly a ptca balloon catheter was inserted over a 0.014 guidewire close to the constrained portion of the endoprosthesis to force deployment.Also this attempt remained unsuccessfully.Thirdly it was tried to cannulate the constrained portion without any success.Fourthly the delivery catheter was cut outside of the 12fr introducer sheath and a smaller sheath was inserted with the unsuccessful attempt to remove the partial deployed endoprosthesis from the patient¿s vessel.Finally the partial deployed endoprosthesis was retrieved into the proximal superficial femoral artery by using a snare device where the device was surgically removed.It was stated that the lesion was repaired with a patch.The procedure was successfully completed by implanting two gore® viabahn® endoprostheses (10mm x 10cm).It was stated that the second gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis was needed to be implanted in order to treat a vessel dissection which occurred based on the deployment difficulties of the first used medical device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS
Type of Device
NIP
Manufacturer (Section D)
W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES
flagstaff AZ
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDICAL EAST B/P
1500 n. fourth street
flagstaff AZ 86004
Manufacturer Contact
barbara ulrich
1500 n. 4th street
flagstaff, AZ 
9285263030
MDR Report Key6975481
MDR Text Key91102003
Report Number2017233-2017-00551
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PFV
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIT
PMA/PMN Number
P040037
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/16/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/25/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/19/2020
Device Catalogue NumberPAH101502E
Device Lot Number17178072
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/20/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/20/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age79 YR
-
-