• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT XACT CAROTID STENT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT XACT CAROTID STENT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 82086-01
Device Problems Inaccurate Delivery (2339); Physical Resistance (2578)
Patient Problem Vasoconstriction (2126)
Event Date 10/11/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Internal file number - (b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The device was not returned for evaluation.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents from this lot.The investigation determined the reported difficulties and patient effect (vessel spasm) appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
 
Event Description
It was reported the procedure was performed to treat a lesion with moderate calcification and mild tortuosity in the internal carotid artery.An attempt was made to direct stent with a 9 x 40 mm xact stent.The xact stent system was advanced, but could not cross the lesion due to the anatomy.The physician attempted multiple times pushing the device, but was unsuccessful and the vessel went into spasm.The xact was removed from the anatomy without resistance, and a 4.0 x 20 mm viatrac balloon catheter was advanced for pre-dilatation.Then, the xact was re-advanced but still could not cross the lesion due to the anatomy and was withdrawn from the anatomy a second time.Once again, dilatation was performed using a 5.0 x 20 mm viatrac balloon catheter.The xact was advanced a third time; however, vessel spasm occurred again.The patient was given medication for the vessel spasm.The xact was advanced to the target lesion, but during deployment the stent jumped distally.Therefore, a 9 x 30 mm xact was advanced without issue and implanted proximally with a 5 mm overlap of the 9 x 40 mm xact stent to successfully cover the remaining part of the lesion.Post dilatation was performed with good results.There was no adverse patient effect and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
XACT CAROTID STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
CAROTID STENT SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT VASCULAR, TEMECULA, CA USA REG# 2024168
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key6977628
MDR Text Key90983407
Report Number2024168-2017-08466
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIM
UDI-Device Identifier08717648010224
UDI-Public08717648010224
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P040038
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/25/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/25/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/31/2018
Device Catalogue Number82086-01
Device Lot Number5080361
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/11/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/01/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-