• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: KANEKA CORPORATION LACRIFAST; LACRIMAL STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

KANEKA CORPORATION LACRIFAST; LACRIMAL STENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number LF2-R105
Device Problems Material Puncture/Hole (1504); Material Separation (1562); Use of Device Problem (1670); Device Handling Problem (3265)
Patient Problem Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 10/10/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
- the concerned device "lacrifast" is not distributed in the us under this device name, but is identical to the device "lacriflow lacrimal stent" distributed in the us under 510(k) # k120886.- the actual device used was returned and investigated: no deformation or damage was found in the pair of tubes except for missing the stainless-steel ring mounted in the tip of the tube (colored in clear).- as a possible cause of the penetration of the bougie and dropping off the ring during the use, we speculate as follows: when the doctor tried to insert and advance the tube with the bougie inserted in the tube forcibly in the occluded nasal duct, excessive mechanical force was loaded on the ring, where the tip of the bougie touched, and the bougie together with the ring penetrated out of the opening duct in the tip of the tube.
 
Event Description
This device (lacrifast) was employed to treat the epiphora due to lacrimal duct obstruction.The doctor inserted one of the lacrimal duct tube (colored in clear) into the obstructed lacrimal duct.While advancing the tube, the doctor felt strong resistance and gave up to further insert the tube, and he retrieved it out of the patient's lacrimal duct.When the actual device used was investigated, the ring was dismounted and missing.The ring's whereabouts was not confirmed during the procedure in this eye clinic, and accordingly, the missing stainless steel ring might have been remaining in the patient body.He used another lacrifast and completed the operation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LACRIFAST
Type of Device
LACRIMAL STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
KANEKA CORPORATION
2-3-18
nakanoshima, kita-ku
osaka, osaka 530-8 288
JA  530-8288
Manufacturer Contact
kazuhiko inoue
2-3-18
nakanoshima,kita-ku
osaka, osaka 530-8-288
JA   530-8288
31814120
MDR Report Key6986216
MDR Text Key91103251
Report Number3009761573-2017-00004
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OKS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/17/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/29/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/30/2020
Device Catalogue NumberLF2-R105
Device Lot NumberKP047292
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/27/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/17/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/08/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age86 YR
-
-