• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EXTERNAL MANUFACTURER PROGRAMMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EXTERNAL MANUFACTURER PROGRAMMER Back to Search Results
Model Number 3300
Device Problems Pacing Problem (1439); Capturing Problem (2891)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 09/28/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The programmer remains available for use.It was suspected the issue of the psa pacing in the rv when ra pacing was commanded was due to bad psa cables or incorrect connections to the lead.The field representative confirmed the cables had been exchanged and reconnected, and they were not able to recreate the observation after proper ra pacing was obtained.The field representative also confirmed the threshold measurements were taken with the boston scientific psa and the competitor's psa with no changes to pacing vectors or lead position, and for all leads the difference was approximately 1v.For future implant cases, the hospital planned to test lead measurements with both psas.As no further information concerning this report is expected, our investigation is complete.This investigation will be updated should further information be provided.
 
Event Description
Boston scientific received information that this programmer's pacing system analyzer (psa) feature was used during an implant procedure.The physician made two observations about the programmer's psa.First, during testing for the right atrial (ra) lead, the psa cables were properly connected to the right ventricular (rv) and ra leads.However, when the field representative commanded the psa to pace in the ra, the stimulation was observed in the rv.This happened a second time, until suddenly the ra lead was pacing as expected.Due to this anomaly, another manufacturer's psa was used to test the measurements of all leads.It was then observed that the pacing threshold measurements with the competitor's psa were approximately 1v less than the threshold measurements with the boston scientific psa.When the leads were tested with the implanted cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker (crt-p), the threshold measurements were consistent with the non-boston scientific psa.The physician complained that the mismatch in threshold values was responsible for prolonging the procedure, as the initial left ventricular (lv) lead was removed and replaced due to high pacing threshold measurements.A clinical decision was made to change the lead based on the measurements from the boston scientific psa.No adverse patient effects were reported, and the crt-p system was implanted successfully.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROGRAMMER
Type of Device
PROGRAMMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
EXTERNAL MANUFACTURER
Manufacturer (Section G)
EXTERNAL MANUFACTURER
Manufacturer Contact
tim degroot
4100 hamline ave. n
st. paul, MN 
6515826168
MDR Report Key6995741
MDR Text Key91206068
Report Number2124215-2017-19933
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OSR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeES
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/28/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/02/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model Number3300
Other Device ID NumberLATITUDE PROGRAMMER
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/28/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/07/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age72 YR
-
-