• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVE DIVISION MOSAIC AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVE DIVISION MOSAIC AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 305
Device Problems Gradient Increase (1270); Structural Problem (2506); Material Distortion (2977)
Patient Problems Corneal Pannus (1447); Aortic Regurgitation (1716); Aortic Valve Stenosis (1717); Calcium Deposits/Calcification (1758); Cusp Tear (2656)
Event Date 09/28/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The product has been returned and analysis is in progress.Upon completion of analysis, a supplemental report will be submitted.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that 11 years post implant of this aortic bioprosthetic valve, echocardiogram showed stenosis, regurgitation, elevated gradients and a leaflet tear.The valve was explanted and replaced with a non-medtronic valve.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: upon receipt at medtronic¿s quality laboratory, visual inspection showed the valve was slightly distorted; oval shaped.The sewing ring appeared to have been cut and/or removed during explant exposing the stent.All leaflets were in the closed position however, due to calcification, the free margins and part of the leaflet lunula had deteriorated, creating a gap at the point of coaptation.All leaflets were stiff but slightly flexible except where visible calcification and pannus extended on the inflow and outflow.Tissue deterioration due to visible calcification was observed on all leaflets and on all commissures.There was no evidence of commissure dehiscence.Pannus on the inflow extended from the sewing ring to the base stitching encroaching 1 to 6mm onto the left and non-coronary cusps and into all inferior coaptive areas.Thick pannus was observed across the middle of the right cusp (inflow).The observed pannus contributed to the reduced inflow orifice area.Extrinsic calcification was noted on the existing cusps.An unknown amount of pannus appeared to have been removed during explant.Radiography revealed calcification in all leaflets and commissures.Reduced performance of the valve is attributed to host tissue overgrowth.This finding is generally considered a patient-related condition.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Added serial number.Added expiration date.Added unique identifier (udi).Added device manufacture date.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MOSAIC AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVE DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVE DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key7006303
MDR Text Key91232042
Report Number2025587-2017-02044
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P990064
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/17/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/07/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/26/2011
Device Model Number305
Device Catalogue Number305-29
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/16/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/13/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/26/2006
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age57 YR
-
-