• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LDR MÉDICAL AVENUE L ANCHORING PLATE M; INTERVERTEBRAL BODY FUSION DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LDR MÉDICAL AVENUE L ANCHORING PLATE M; INTERVERTEBRAL BODY FUSION DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problems Positioning Failure (1158); Mechanical Jam (2983)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 10/11/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Complaint product can be one of the following products.Description don't allow to know which of them was wasted.Both device history records and traceability was reviewed and did not reveal any non-conformances to specifications or deviations in procedures that might have contributed to the reported event.Ref : ir6002t / lot : 677870, expiration date : 01 sept 2021, device manufacture date : 10 oct 2016.Ref : ir6002t / lot : 682752, expiration date : 01 dec 2021, device manufacture date : 03 jan 2017.Device was discarded.
 
Event Description
Avenue l : anchoring plate wouldn't deploy and jammed.First cage was implanted without problem.For the second level, reporter warned surgeon not to implant the lower anchoring plate (conflict risk with other instrumentation).Surgeon still wanted to implant anchoring plate.Reporter told him to stop if he felt resistance.Surgeon felt resistance and stopped implanting.Surgeon had to retrieve cage and anchoring plate.The cage was then implanted again with only one upper anchoring plate.Removed anchoring plate discarded.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Fields were updated for that medwatch report.Without a product return, no product evaluation is able to be conducted.As described by reporter, lower anchor shouldn't have been implanted because it would surly be in conflict with instrumentation already in place.The review tracaebility and review of the device history records and traceability for the devices did not reveal any non-conformances to specifications or deviations in procedures that might have contributed to the reported event.Surgeon was aware of the posterior fixation and as indicated into avenue-l surgical technique : "in case of posterior construct, it¿s imperative to verify the trajectory of the anchoring plate before implantation.If there is contact with additional hardware (posterior screws, steinman pins, etc.), do not force and it may be necessary to remove the half-anchoring plate." regarding information provided, root cause of this issue is related to an user error.The investigation found no evidence to indicate a device issue.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AVENUE L ANCHORING PLATE M
Type of Device
INTERVERTEBRAL BODY FUSION DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
LDR MÉDICAL
quartier europe de l¿ouest
5, rue de berlin
sainte-savine 10300
FR  10300
Manufacturer (Section G)
LDR MÉDICAL
quartier europe de l¿ouest
5, rue de berlin
sainte-savine 10300
FR   10300
Manufacturer Contact
loic richard
quartier europe de l¿ouest
5, rue de berlin
sainte-savine 10300
FR   10300
3325823263
MDR Report Key7012525
MDR Text Key91414560
Report Number3004788213-2017-00179
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MAX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/09/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/09/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue NumberIR6002T
Other Device ID NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received10/11/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberN/A
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age38 YR
-
-