Complaint product can be one of the following products.Description don't allow to know which of them was wasted.Both device history records and traceability was reviewed and did not reveal any non-conformances to specifications or deviations in procedures that might have contributed to the reported event.Ref : ir6002t / lot : 677870, expiration date : 01 sept 2021, device manufacture date : 10 oct 2016.Ref : ir6002t / lot : 682752, expiration date : 01 dec 2021, device manufacture date : 03 jan 2017.Device was discarded.
|
Fields were updated for that medwatch report.Without a product return, no product evaluation is able to be conducted.As described by reporter, lower anchor shouldn't have been implanted because it would surly be in conflict with instrumentation already in place.The review tracaebility and review of the device history records and traceability for the devices did not reveal any non-conformances to specifications or deviations in procedures that might have contributed to the reported event.Surgeon was aware of the posterior fixation and as indicated into avenue-l surgical technique : "in case of posterior construct, it¿s imperative to verify the trajectory of the anchoring plate before implantation.If there is contact with additional hardware (posterior screws, steinman pins, etc.), do not force and it may be necessary to remove the half-anchoring plate." regarding information provided, root cause of this issue is related to an user error.The investigation found no evidence to indicate a device issue.
|