Batch history review is not possible because either the product reference nor the batch number of the involved device is known.Despite requests, either precise information about the device nor x-ray pictures are available for analysis.Consequently no thorough investigation can be performed.No link between the filter and the reported complaint can be established.No conclusion can be drawn.B braun medical (b)(4) has provided all the information currently available.In spite of all reasonable efforts being made to obtain further information, at this time we have not met with success.
|
"on or about on (b)(6) 2003, patient was implanted with the venatech vena cava filter.Patient had been hospitalized, and upon information and belief, was implanted the filter for pre-surgical purposes of prevent further dvts.The filter system that was implanted was positively identified on patient's medical records.The surgery was ordered by a dr.(b)(6).Upon information and belief, the filter was implanted and utilized in accordance with braun's specific instructions, guidelines, and directives.The patient has never considered for revision or removal of the device by any medical professionals, nor was the patient recommended to consider removal upon discharge.On or about (b)(6) 2017, patient received a scan on abdomen region after complaints of lower extremity swelling.The scan confirmed patient's ivc filter was within the affect region and mild calcification within that area as well.The patient's implant, remains within the body for over fourteen years, which constitutes a long-term implant and made the patient dramatically more susceptible to the threat of imminent threat of death, migration, thrombosis, blockage or other life-threatening side effects.".
|