• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ATOS MEDICAL AB PROVOX BRUSH; AIRWAY DEVICE CLEANING BRUSH, INVASIVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ATOS MEDICAL AB PROVOX BRUSH; AIRWAY DEVICE CLEANING BRUSH, INVASIVE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 7204
Device Problem Material Rupture (1546)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 10/30/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation: inspection was done visually in microscope.Internal investigation: the wire of the brush is broken.As seen in pictures in the investigation file, the bristles of the device are heavily worn.The bristles are destroyed and lying down, the bristles have not been suitable to perform their function for some time.Both the twisted steel wires are broken, almost at the same place.No deformations or clamp marks that could have caused the breakage was found.This indicates that the breakage is not due to any failure in the wire material since the twisted wire is made of stainless steel and unlikely to be broken at same place.However, it is possible to break the wire if the brush head is bent back and forwards a couple of times.There are also signs of wear seen in the shaft of the brush, whitening in the material indicates that the rear end of the shaft has been bent.In the ifu for provox brush there is a warning picture showing that bending the brush head is not allowed.Conclusion: no material failure is found.The twisted metal wires of the brush have been broken off at same place and this can happened if the wire was bent several times.According to manual it not allowed to bend the brush on the metal wire.The breakage is most likely caused by wrong handling of the product.Corrective and preventive action: inform the patient to change the brush when it is worn and follow the ifu.Bending of the twisted wire is not allowed.If bending is necessary it has to be done on the blue shaft as described in the ifu.
 
Event Description
We have received a complaint from university hospital of (b)(6) regarding a broken provox brush.The patient who has been using this provox brush said that she had not bended the brush.The provox brush broke in the provox prosthesis but the patient took the broken part or the tip of the brush away with a forceps.The situation was scary and the patient was frightened of the situation.Everything went fine but the missing piece could have ended up in the lungs or esophagus.Additional info: the prosthesis used was provox vega 8mm.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROVOX BRUSH
Type of Device
AIRWAY DEVICE CLEANING BRUSH, INVASIVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ATOS MEDICAL AB
kraftgatan 8
horby, SE-24 222
SW  SE-24222
Manufacturer (Section G)
ATOS MEDICAL AB
kraftgatan 8
horby, SE-24 222
SW   SE-24222
Manufacturer Contact
karolina nilsson
kraftgatan 8
horby, SE-24-222
SW   SE-24222
MDR Report Key7058457
MDR Text Key93559912
Report Number8032044-2017-00013
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LRC
UDI-Device Identifier07331791000775
UDI-Public7331791000775
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFI
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/06/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/27/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date09/30/2020
Device Catalogue Number7204
Device Lot Number1510001
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/17/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received11/06/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/14/2015
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-