(b)(4).Investigation results visual analysis of the returned nephromax balloon material revealed that the balloon was torn longitudinally.The tear was located approximately 6mm distal of distal markerband and extending over the balloon material for approximately 76mm proximally.A microscopic examination found no issue with the markerband which could potentially have contributed to the tear.A visual and tactile examination identified no damage along the length of the device.No other issues were identified during the product analysis.The complaint investigation indicates that the complaint is associated with a product that meets the design and manufacturing but due to anatomical/procedural factors encountered during the procedure, performance was limited.Therefore, the most probable root cause classification for the reported failure is operational context.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed and confirmed that this device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.A labeling review was performed and from the information available, this device was used per the directions for use (dfu)/product label.A search of the complaint database revealed that no other complaints exist for the specified lot.
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a nephromax dilatation balloon was used in the renal during a dilatation of nephrostomy procedure performed on (b)(6) 2017.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the balloon was leaking.The procedure was completed at this time.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be good.Note: this event has been deemed an mdr-reportable event based on investigation results which revealed that the balloon was torn longitudinally.
|