• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. / MEDOS S.A. HAKIM PROGRAMMABLE VALVE WITH PRECHAMBER; SHUNT, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM & COMPS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. / MEDOS S.A. HAKIM PROGRAMMABLE VALVE WITH PRECHAMBER; SHUNT, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM & COMPS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 82-3100
Device Problem Programming Issue (3014)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Date 11/09/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Upon completion of the investigation, a follow up report will be filed.
 
Event Description
(b)(6) said that surgeon attempt to re-program the setting of the valve but failed for many times.After checking the patient record, the valve was implanted many years ago and previous re-program failed as well.Recently, the valve is taken out and replaced with another similar one.It is observed that there is something stuck in the valve which led to malfunctioning of the valve and fail to program.P.S.Product code suspected to be (b)(4) but unable to input via unity.Patient consequence? :yes.Patient consequence description: hydrocephalus not resolved with failed re-programming action taken for procedure: reoperated to replace with another valve.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been returned for evaluation.Upon completion of the investigation, a follow-up report will be submitted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected udi: device was made prior to compliance date, gtin unavailable; (b)(4).Upon completion of the investigation it was noted that the images were taken of the ¿as received¿ valve.The valve was visually inspected; biological debris was noted inside the valve.The position of the cam when valve was received was 180 mmh2o.The valve was hydrated.The valve was tested for programming with programmer 82-3126 with serial (b)(4) and programmer 82-3190 with serial (b)(4), the valve failed the test, the cam mechanism did not move during the programming process.The valve was flushed passed.The valve was leak tested, no leaks noted.The valve was reflux tested and passed.The valve was dried.The valve was then pressure tested at 180 mmh2o, passed.The valve was dismantled and was examined under microscope at appropriate magnification: biological debris was found on the spring, on the spring pillar, on the cam mechanism, and on the base plate.The cam magnets were also controlled.The magnets passed.Review of the history device records for the valve product code 82-3100, with lot 1190401 conformed to the specifications when released to stock on the 3rd june 2004.The root cause of the problem reported by the customer is due to the biological debris found on the spring, on the spring pillar, on the cam mechanism, and on the base plate.Based on the results of this investigation no further action is required.Trends will be monitored for this and similar complaints.At the present time this complaint is closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HAKIM PROGRAMMABLE VALVE WITH PRECHAMBER
Type of Device
SHUNT, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM & COMPS
Manufacturer (Section D)
CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. / MEDOS S.A.
rue girardet 29
le locle CH 24 00
SZ  CH 2400
Manufacturer Contact
james kenney
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
5088282726
MDR Report Key7075604
MDR Text Key93492867
Report Number1226348-2017-10909
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JXG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K974739
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Medical Equipment Company Technician/Representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/01/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/31/2009
Device Catalogue Number82-3100
Device Lot Number1190401
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/27/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received01/25/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/03/2004
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-