Patient information is unknown.Implant date is unknown.Explant date is unknown.A review of the device history records has been requested.The device was received, the investigation could not be completed, and no conclusion could be drawn, as product is entering the complaint system.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
A device history record (dhr) review was performed for part # 298.801.01, lot # p262156, supplier lot # p262156: release to warehouse date: 17 dec 2016, supplier: (b)(4): no non-conformance reports (ncrs) were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product, and any sub-components, which would contribute to this complaint condition.A product investigation was performed.It was reported that during surgery, the cable broke during tensioning.This complaint is confirmed.The cable was received at customer quality (cq) in two pieces.The two ends created by the break are also frayed.Whether this complaint can be replicated at (cq) is not applicable for this complaint condition.No new malfunctions were identified as a result of the investigation.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product, and any sub-components, which would contribute to this complaint condition.The material and relevant material properties were determined to be conforming at the time of manufacture based on review of the dhr.Cable with crimp assembly drawing was reviewed during this investigation.No product design issues or discrepancies were observed.The diameter of the returned cable near location of breakage was measured at cq and is within specification.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Corrected data: brand name, catalog number, udi number.Due to the intra-operative events, the device was not successfully implanted.An alternate device was used to complete procedural step.As such, implant/explant dates are not applicable.Device returned to manufacturer.Physical manufacturer.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|