Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Date of initial implant is (b)(6) 2016.Exact date is unknown.Date of explant is 2017.Exact date is unknown.Analysis of the device could not be completed as no product was returned to the manufacturer.The subject device is not expected to be returned to the manufacturer.If information is obtained after time of initial submission, it will be filed as appropriate.Device not returned to manufacturer.
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Date of initial implant is (b)(6) 2016.Exact date is unknown.Date of explant is 2017.Exact date is unknown.Analysis of the device could not be completed as no product was returned to the manufacturer.The subject device is not expected to be returned to the manufacturer.If information is obtained after time of initial submission, it will be filed as appropriate.Initial report of the event was received by the manufacturer on 04/17/2017, not on 05/15/2017 as previously reported.A review of the product's device history record was completed on 06/05/2017, including a review of the product's labeling and manufacturing processes.No issues were found during review of the product's dhr, or manufacturing or labeling, that would contribute to the condition described by the reporter.Analysis of the actual device could not be completed, as no device was received.The subject device is not expected to be returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.Non non-conformances were generated during the production of the subject device.Additional correspondence with the reporter identified that the patient had previous infection that was not completely removed prior to implanting the peek device.Reporter stated that the psi was removed to clear the remaining infection.Reporter stated that the infection has since been cleared and that the patient was in stable condition prior to follow-up surgery.
|