• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY CAROTID WALLSTENT¿; STENT, CAROTID

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY CAROTID WALLSTENT¿; STENT, CAROTID Back to Search Results
Model Number H965SCH647090
Device Problem Positioning Failure (1158)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 10/09/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The device was returned with the stent fully mounted onto the delivery system.A visual and tactile examination on the shaft identified one severe kink 6mm proximal to the tip of the device.The kink was so severe it extended down through the mounted stent into the inner shaft of the device.This type of damage is consistent with excessive force being applied to the delivery system.No issues were noted with the inner or outer shaft that could have contributed to the compliant incident.The stent was returned in the correct position on the delivery system.The distal end of the mounted shaft was noted to be damaged due to the severe shaft kink.During analysis the investigator successfully deployed the stent without any resistance or issues noted.A visual and microscopic examination identified that the struts of the distal section of the device where damaged.This damage was caused by the severe kink identified on the shaft of the device.No issues were noted with the stent that could have contributed to the complaint incident.A visual and microscopic examination identified no damage or any issues with the stent cups, stent holder or tip of the device that could have contributed to the complaint incident.No other issues were identified during the product analysis.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The investigation conclusion is operational context as the product meets the design & manufacture specification but due to anatomical/procedural factors encountered during the procedure, performance was limited.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Reportable based on device analysis completed on 14nov2017.It was reported that stent failed to deploy.Vascular access was obtained via the brachial artery.The 12mm x 10mm target lesion was located in the non-tortuous and non-calcified carotid artery.A 8.0-36mm carotid wallstent¿ was advanced to treat the lesion.However, the stent was unable to deploy from the delivery system.The physician reconstrain the stent prior to removal of the device.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status was stable.However, returned device analysis revealed stent damaged.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CAROTID WALLSTENT¿
Type of Device
STENT, CAROTID
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
Manufacturer Contact
sonali arangil
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key7083529
MDR Text Key94503327
Report Number2134265-2017-11751
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCO
PMA/PMN Number
P050019
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/14/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/05/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/22/2020
Device Model NumberH965SCH647090
Device Catalogue NumberSCH-64709
Device Lot Number19744567
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/18/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/14/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/23/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-