(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.(b)(4).The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar incidents from this lot.In this case, there was no reported product issue and the reported information of using the product after the expiration date appears to be user related.The expiration date of the product is important for the sterility, efficacy, and performance of the device.It should be noted that the supera instruction for use states: use this device prior to the use by (expiration) date as specified on the device package label.The investigation determined the reported complaint was user related.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|