Results: the indigo system aspiration catheter 6 (cat6) was fractured and stretched approximately 46.0 cm from the hub.The stretched region of the cat6 began approximately 46.0 cm from the hub and ended approximately 72.0 cm from the hub.The cat6 was ovalized near its distal tip.The effective length of the cat6 was measured to be approximately 146.0 cm.Prior to decontamination, dried blood was observed throughout the cat6 lumen.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned device revealed the cat6 was stretched and fractured.This damage likely contributed to the cat6 becoming stuck on the wire, as was reported in the complaint.This damage likely occurred due to forceful retraction of the cat6 against resistance.It is possible for the cat6 to become pinned against other devices in the system or patient anatomy.If the cat6 becomes pinned or otherwise restrained, and is then forcefully retracted against said resistance, damage such as this may occur.Further evaluation revealed the cat6 was ovalized near its distal tip.This damage may have occurred due to pinching or forceful gripping of the cat6 during preparation for use or post-procedurally.The non-penumbra sheath mentioned in the complaint was not returned for evaluation.Penumbra catheters are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
|
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure to treat a long segment superficial femoral artery (sfa) chronic total occlusion using an indigo system aspiration catheter 6 (cat6).During the procedure, while attempting to advance the cat6 over a non-penumbra guidewire through a non-penumbra sheath, the physician did not mention resistance; however, the cat6 became stuck on the wire and the physician decided to remove it along with the guidewire.Upon removal, the cat6 broke at the mid-shaft.The procedure was completed by performing a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta).There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|