Catalog Number PAJR071502E |
Device Problems
Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Unintended Movement (3026)
|
Patient Problem
No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Date 11/20/2017 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The review of the manufacturing records verified that this lot met all pre-release specifications.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient was presented with a ruptured aneurysm in the left popliteal artery.The rupture and the resulted hematoma were intended to be treated with two gore® viabahn® endoprostheses, envisioned to stop the bleeding, and a surgical intervention to treat the ruptured aneurysm.It was reported to gore that the first gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis (pajr071502e) was implanted successfully.It was stated that also the second gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis (pajr081502e) was inserted and advanced without any difficulties to the target lesion.It was reported that when medical device deployment was initiated, deployment line tension and excessive force were experienced.A visual inspection of the gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis indicated that the endoprosthesis did not deploy at all.Therefore the decision was made to remove the device from the patient¿s vessel.During the removal attempt of the second gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis, a movement of the prior implanted first device into the hematoma was recognized.Based on the device movement, the second gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis was continued to be removed through the introducer sheath, where the first gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis was explanted through open surgery.The procedure was completed by treating the patient¿s aneurysm rupture and hematoma via open surgery.It was stated that the patient was doing well after the procedure.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The previous reported medical device engineering evaluation result belongs to the second gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis which was used during the procedure.For this medical device (pajr081502e) a deployment line tension and excessive force were reported.Subsequently, a visual inspection of the device indicated that the endoprosthesis did not deploy at all.Therefore the decision was made to remove the device from the patient¿s vessel.Due to the deployment failure, this device (pajr081502e) was returned to gore and evaluated.The medical device (pajr071502e) which belongs to the reportable part of the incident, due to an allegation of device migration resulting in a reintervention, was discarded at the facility.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Our engineers have evaluated the returned device.Their investigation showed following: a pair of hemostats were returned, but not evaluated as they are not a gore product.The deployment line had been pulled, leaving 44 cm of deployment line between the deployment knob and hub.The outer braided constraining line was deployed completely, up to the tip-end of the endoprosthesis.The endoprosthesis remained fully constrained.Approximately 0.4 cm of the distal shaft, on which the endoprosthesis is mounted, was exposed at the transition.Deployment was able to be continued with traction on the deployment line at the endoprosthesis.Based on the device examination performed, no manufacturing anomalies were identified.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|