MICROMAR INDUSTRIA E COMERCIO LTDA EASYDRILL PERFORATOR; DRILLS, BURRS, TREPHINES & ACCESSORIES (COMPOUND, POWERED)
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number DM0010FAA |
Device Problem
Device Remains Activated (1525)
|
Patient Problems
Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Perforation (2001)
|
Event Date 11/21/2017 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Report inconclusive.No evaluation was performed, as the device was not returned.If the device is returned in the future, product analysis may be performed.This dm0010faa perforator with lot number 702/16 was manufactured by micromar.Multiple warnings are included in the easydrill cranial perforator ifu manual including: it is essential to keep the drill perpendicular (90°) at the predetermined point of the skull to be drilled, as an excessive deviation from perpendicularity may cause the product to fail and lead to serious patient injury.Select a drill bit suitable for the bone thickness.This prevents the drill from tearing the bone or brain tissue (similar effect when the bit is not positioned at 90°).If the components of the easydrill cranial perforator become loose during trephination, discontinue use.The drill can cut or tear the dura mater when it unlocks.Check some conditions before performing the procedure, such as the existence of adhering dura mater or other anomalies adjacent to the drilling site.We will continue to monitor this complaint type for trends.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the perforator continued to run and did not stop like it was supposed to.Thus, the patient suffered a dura and cortex lesion with some hemorrhage subsequent due to the perforator not stopping.On follow up it was reported the cortical bleeding was immediately treated.The cortical bleeding was reduced with bipolar coagulation and hemostatic (surgiflo+surgicell).The subcortical bleeding did not require surgical evacuation, but the patient was submitted to serial brain cts to assure stability and resolution.The event occurred during the first burr hole while physician was performing a dbs procedure.The burr hole site was in the pre-coronal region.The skull was described as usually fairly thick.More than 5 mm.The current status of the patient was described as well and healthy.Patient identification information was provided.Information on the concomitant devices was also provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Report not confirmed.Evaluation could not reproduce the reported malfunction of continues to run.Device history record was reviewed by micromar and per their report, all the processes were executed according to what was planned and validated.There were no observations or nonconformities during the manufacturing process was reviewed and did not reflect any conditions related to the current, reported malfunction.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|