Upon review of the device history for the serial number (b)(4), it was determined that the device was manufactured on (b)(6) 2011 and the one (1) year warranty period has expired.Due to the age of the device and the fact there are no repairs available for the video baton the customer elected to replace the glidescope avl video baton 3-4.The video baton was not returned to verathon for evaluation, therefore the cause could not be conclusively determined.However, it is likely that the age of the device, six (6) years, caused or contributed to the event.Corrective action is not required at this time.Verathon will continue to monitor for trends.
|
The customer reported that during a patient, using a glidescope avl video baton 3-4, the video baton was not recognized by the video monitor and would not display an image.Reportedly second video baton was used with the same video monitor to complete the procedure, however the amount of time needed to prepare the second video baton was not reported.No harm to patient or user was reported.
|