• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BRAINLAB AG EXACTRAC (VERSION 6.2); PATIENT POSITIONING SYSTEM, RADIATION THERAPY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BRAINLAB AG EXACTRAC (VERSION 6.2); PATIENT POSITIONING SYSTEM, RADIATION THERAPY Back to Search Results
Model Number 48362
Device Problems Inadequate Instructions for Healthcare Professional (1319); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Radiation Overdose (1510); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 11/22/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Although according to the hospital there are no negative clinical effects for this patient due to this issue, a risk to the patient's health could not be excluded for these specific circumstances, since the patient has been irradiated in a different position than intended, with the brainlab device involved.A comprehensive investigation by brainlab regarding this specific event is currently ongoing and final conclusions are pending.Brainlab plans to issue a follow-up report to the fda upon completion of investigation.
 
Event Description
A patient was intended to be positioned for a prostate rt treatment on (b)(6) 2017 with brainlab exactrac patient positioning system (version 6.2) and varian truebeam radiotherapy system (version 2.5), using the auxiliary device interface (adi).Adi is utilized to send couch move requests from exactrac to the treatment application and to authorize beam requests of the treatment application by exactrac.As long as no patient is loaded within exactrac, it always authorizes every request from the truebeam side.When a patient is loaded by exactrac, exactrac verifies the position of the patient and only authorizes beam requests if the patient is correctly positioned (i.E.Ok icon visible on exactrac screen).For this specific treatment the patient has been opened on the varian truebeam and a message box for patient opening was displayed in exactrac.A beam was selected on truebeam and afterwards the message box in exactrac was acknowledged by clicking "open", which opened automatically the patient in the exactrac software.After prepositioning of the patient the correction shifts for exact patient positioning have been calculated by exactrac with the x-ray correction step.The calculated pitch and roll shifts were applied by the brainlab robotics.The translation shifts could not be applied for the couch and exactrac showed a corresponding error message.Apparently, despite the translations have not been applied and exactrac did not show the "ok" icon, the truebeam was authorized to treat and the treatment was started by the hospital's therapist.After a few seconds of treatment the hospital's therapist realized that the exactrac software does not show "ok" for correct patient positioning and he stopped the treatment.The patient has been repositioned and correct positioning was verified.The treatment could be completed as intended.According to the hospital there are no negative clinical effects for this patient due to this issue, despite the patient has been irradiated in a different position than intended.The customer additionally observed this behavior (truebeam authorized to treat despite translations are not applied) during treatments for other patients on (b)(6) 2017.For these patients no unintended irradiation occurred, since the problem has been detected before irradiation.The treatments could be performed as intended.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
According to the results of technical investigation and the information provided by the hospital, it can be concluded that the root cause for the incorrect treatment of the patient on (b)(6) 2017 is a combination of: use error, due to not following the required workflow order, not verifying the correct patient position and not observing the exactrac warning message before applying the treatment beam, and insufficient descriptions and warnings in the instructions for use (user guide) regarding beam authorization by exactrac via adi for further details please refer to the attached field safety notice / product notification letter capa-(b)(4).For detailed results of investigation.Brainlab conclusion: a risk to patient health cannot be excluded if this scenario would reoccur, since, if a deviation of the patient position from the planned treatment position remains undetected by the user and the actual treatment beam that has been previously authorized by exactrac via adi is initialized by the user, underdose of the planned target volume and/or overdose of healthy tissue could occur if the deviation exceeds clinically acceptable tolerances for the indication being treated.Brainlab intends the following corrective actions: 1.Existing potentially affected customers receive a product notification information.2.These customers receive the an update to the instructions for use bl-il-60960- 84_rev1.0 regarding beam authorization by exactrac via adi.The 21 cfr 806 relevant information has been submitted to fda recall coordinators.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EXACTRAC (VERSION 6.2)
Type of Device
PATIENT POSITIONING SYSTEM, RADIATION THERAPY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BRAINLAB AG
olof-palme-strasse 9
munich, 81829
GM  81829
MDR Report Key7141576
MDR Text Key95933598
Report Number8043933-2017-00033
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code IYE
UDI-Device Identifier04056481000264
UDI-Public04056481000264
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K120789
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/22/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/22/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number48362
Device Catalogue Number20881
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received11/22/2017
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-