• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OBERDORF : SYNTHES PRODUKTIONS GMBH; INTERVERTEBAL FUSION DEVICE W/BONE GRAFT, LUMBAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OBERDORF : SYNTHES PRODUKTIONS GMBH; INTERVERTEBAL FUSION DEVICE W/BONE GRAFT, LUMBAR Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 12/01/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Patient id/initials, age/date of birth and weight are unknown.Device has not been explanted.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Contact phone number was not provided.(b)(4).Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Device report from synthes europe reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that to prepare the disc space for the insertion of the tlif cage, the surgeon used kerrisons and rongeurs.After that, the surgeon used the t-pal shavers and determined that the definitive implant cage should be a tpal small 10 mm; no trial implants were used.Once filled in with autolog bone from the patient and loaded on the tpal inserter, the cage was given to the surgeon for implantation.To insert the cage, some heavy hammering was needed.To both help the cage progress and rotate, in several occasions the t-pal inserter was hammered while maintaining the applicator handle medially.Under fluoroscopy, the cage was positioned according to the surgical technique recommendations.To release the cage, the surgeon pushed the security ring down and turned the handle counterclockwise until it stopped.The applicator did not disengage from the implant.To help with removing the instrument, the surgeon decided to disassemble the handle and external applicator to leave only the internal applicator.Then he was able to remove the instrument.However, the cage had moved back.With the instrument 394.572, the surgeon tried to reposition and push the implant but it did not work.The surgeon decided to leave the cage partially rotated.There were no patient consequences.Concomitant devices: graft pusher (part 394.572, lot unknown, quantity 1); hammer (part/lot unknown, quantity 1).This report is for an unknown tlif cage.This is report 4 of 4 for (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
There was approximately 15-20 minutes surgical delay due to time required to disassemble the instrument, remove it from patient, try repositioning the implant, and check with x-ray.Surgery was completed successfully except that the cage could not be perfectly positioned according to surgical technique recommendations.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
INTERVERTEBAL FUSION DEVICE W/BONE GRAFT, LUMBAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
OBERDORF : SYNTHES PRODUKTIONS GMBH
eimattstrasse 3
oberdorf
SZ 
Manufacturer Contact
michael cote
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key7154070
MDR Text Key96027637
Report Number8030965-2017-51005
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MAX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSZ
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/01/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/29/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/27/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-