• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ALCON RESEARCH, LTD. - ALCON PRECISION DEVICE ALCON MICROSURGICAL INSTRUMENTS, CANNULA OPHTHALMIC; CANNULA, OPHTHALMIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ALCON RESEARCH, LTD. - ALCON PRECISION DEVICE ALCON MICROSURGICAL INSTRUMENTS, CANNULA OPHTHALMIC; CANNULA, OPHTHALMIC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 8065420020
Device Problem Detachment Of Device Component (1104)
Patient Problem Vitreous Loss (2142)
Event Date 12/13/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation including root cause analysis is in progress.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
A company representative reported that an anterior chamber cannula flew off in the patient's eye and caused a vitreous hemorrhage.The nurse and surgeon checked it was on tight before using in patient's eye.When pressure was put through while hydrating the stroma during a cataract procedure, the cannula came off in the patient's eye and caused a bleed in the eye (vitreous hemorrhage).They could not see where the blood was coming from as the eye was red.The procedure was complete and the patient required an anterior vitrectomy.The patient will be returning for a second evaluation on a further date.No other information available.Additional information has been requested and received.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Cannula product evaluation no lot number was identified with this complaint; therefore, lot history and complaint history reviews could not be conducted.One opened cannula was received for evaluation.The sample was visually inspected and was found conforming and no foreign matter was observed inside the hub or the cannula.The sample was then functionally tested for air flow and was found non-conforming.No foreign matter was observed in the cannula after air flow testing.The sample was then functionally tested for fit with syringe and luer taper and was found conforming for both functional tests.Root cause: the evaluation confirmed that the cannula was occluded, which would cause back pressure and could cause the cannula to pop off of the syringe as was reported.The returned sample was returned opened, therefore how and when the cannula tip became blocked cannot be determined from this evaluation and an exact root cause cannot be determined for the complaint as described by the customer.The complaint file states that the cannula was used in surgery prior to coming off of the syringe, therefore, a potential contributing factor would be procedural residue being introduced into the cannula, causing the blockage.The complaint file also states that there is ¿suspected user error¿ during the use of the product, which would be another potential contributing factor of the defect seen.Syringe product evaluation: device history record review is not possible since no lot was provided.A complaint history check was performed and this is the first complaint for this contract, component and type of event in a period of one year.As a complaint sample a syringe 3 millimeter (ml) was received.The screw thread of the luer lock did not show any damage.The syringe was filled with water and a cannula was attached.The cannula did not flow off when the water was released.The root cause was found inconclusive ¿ unable to verify.No lot available, no detailed investigation of the root cause is possible.Investigation of the complaint sample (syringe) could not confirm the complaint.Investigation of the complaint sample (cannula) confirmed the cannula was occluded.The most potential root causes are: external ¿ material supplier related -- the syringes are supplied to the manufacturer by a third party suppler and added to the custom-pak product.No visual or functional inspection of the syringes is performed prior to assembly of the custom-pak product.Evaluation of the sample (syringe) could not confirm the complaint.Also no lot number of the syringe is available.Therefore no quality remark will be forwarded to the supplier.The cannulas are supplied to the manufacturer in a package.The packed cannulas are added as such to the custom-pak product.No visual or functional inspection of the cannulas is performed prior to assembly of the custom-pak product.External ¿ use error -- it is also possible that the customer did not use the cannula/syringe correctly, this was stated in the complaint file.In the complaint description the sales representative suspects user error.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ALCON MICROSURGICAL INSTRUMENTS, CANNULA OPHTHALMIC
Type of Device
CANNULA, OPHTHALMIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
ALCON RESEARCH, LTD. - ALCON PRECISION DEVICE
714 columbia avenue
sinking spring PA 19608
Manufacturer (Section G)
ALCON RESEARCH, LTD. - ALCON PRECISION DEVICE
714 columbia avenue
sinking spring PA 19608
Manufacturer Contact
nadia bailey
6201 south freeway
mail stop ab2-6
fort worth, TX 76134
8176152230
MDR Report Key7169650
MDR Text Key96582774
Report Number2523835-2018-00010
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HMX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/22/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/05/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number8065420020
Device Lot NumberASKU
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/31/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/03/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age83 YR
-
-