|
Model Number FEM12120 |
Device Problems
Bent (1059); Positioning Failure (1158); Misfire (2532)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 12/04/2017 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
No medical records or no medical images have been made available to the manufacturer.As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during the stent graft placement procedure intended for the venous portion of the av fistula, the stent graft allegedly failed to deploy after excessive force was used due to the outer catheter unable to unsheathe.Reportedly, the device was removed and another device was used to complete the procedure.Furthermore, post procedure, an attempt to deploy the stent graft outside was made and the allegedly the shaft of the catheter was bending.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A manufacturing review was performed.The lot records have been reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of this product and the product was found to have met the specification prior to shipment.The review shows that no remarkable incidents occurred during the manufacturing process.No relevant manufacturing process changes were implemented, that could have led to the event reported.No additional complaint has been reported for this lot number previously.Based on the investigation of the returned sample it could be confirmed that the delivery system could only partially deploy the stent graft, and that the system was bent.The inner liner of the outer sheath was found perforated by a stent graft strut in the sheath marker section, which caused blockage of the system and which made a stent graft deployment impossible.Potential factors which may have caused or contributed to the reported issue have been considered.However, based on the information available and the evaluation of the sample returned, a definite root cause for the reported event could not be determined.In reviewing the applicable labeling for this product it was found that the instructions for use (ifu) sufficiently address the potential risk.The ifu states: 'if unusual resistance or high deployment force is encountered during stent graft deployment, abort the procedure, remove the delivery system and use an alternative device.' regarding the anatomy of the placement site the ifu states: 'the safety and effectiveness of the device when placed across a tight bend including the terminal cephalic arch or across the elbow joint has not been evaluated.Prior to stent graft deployment, ensure that the proximal (inflow) stent graft end is positioned in a straight section of the lumen to reduce the risk of higher deployment forces and possible endovascular system failure.' furthermore, the ifu states: 'prior to loading the endovascular system over a guide wire, both ports must be flushed with sterile saline.Flushing these lumens will also facilitate stent graft deployment.' (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during the stent graft placement procedure intended for the stenosis in the venous portion of the av fistula, the stent graft allegedly failed to deploy after excessive force was used due to the outer catheter unable to unsheathe.It was further reported, the device was removed without incident and an attempt to deploy the stent graft outside the patient's body was made; allegedly the shaft of the catheter was bending.Reportedly, another device was used to complete the procedure.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|