• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MINNETONKA AMS ADVANCE XP SLING SYSTEM; SURGICAL MESH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MINNETONKA AMS ADVANCE XP SLING SYSTEM; SURGICAL MESH Back to Search Results
Device Problem Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Date 12/06/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported the patient's advance xp sling had migrated and the physician noted the sling slipped soon after insertion and stopped working.The patient was implanted with an artificial urinary sphincter device.No further patient complications were reported in relation to this event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AMS ADVANCE XP SLING SYSTEM
Type of Device
SURGICAL MESH
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MINNETONKA
10700 bren road w
minnetonka MN 55343
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MINNETONKA
10700 bren road w
minnetonka MN 55343
Manufacturer Contact
sharon zurn
10700 bren road w
minnetonka, MN 55343
9529306000
MDR Report Key7177175
MDR Text Key96808039
Report Number2183959-2018-00008
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OTM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAU
PMA/PMN Number
SIMILAR
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/21/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/09/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/21/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age52 YR
-
-