The manufacturing batch lot was not provided; therefore, a review of the device history records for the guidewire involved in this incident could not be completed.The device was not received for analysis; therefore, no physical analysis of the product could be performed.The product is reportedly being returned for analysis but wasn't received by the time this report was submitted.Based on the information received to date an exact cause for the incident could not definitely be determined.If the product is returned for analysis or additional information is received a follow-up medwatch report will be submitted.
|
The manufacturing batch lot was not provided; therefore, a review of the device history records for the guidewire involved in this incident could not be completed.The safari guidewire was received for analysis january 17, 2018.As received, the specimen consists of one-1 unknown safari device; returned coiled, loose and double-bagged within "zip-lock" style poly biohazard pouches.The specimen presents a ductile, tensile, overload fracture of the core wire 0.041cm from the distal tip weld mass with subsequent coil stretching.The exposed core wire also presents bend damage with torsional loading 1.36 to 2.22cm from the proximal aspect of the core wire fracture in addition to several bends of varying severity and frequency scattered over the shaft of the device.In addition to the stretched coil wraps over the distal 83cm, the specimen also presents offset/overlapping coil wraps with frayed coating and coating removal scattered over the proximal 72cm.No other damage or inconsistencies are noted to the specimen at this time.The proximal joint appears to be correct and intact by visual examination and by non-destructive testing.Except where noted, the specimen device appears visually and dimensionally correct for a safari 300cm small curve device.As noted in the warnings section of the device instructions for use (dfu), "do not torque this guidewire" and "never advance the guidewire against resistance without first determining the reason for the resistance under fluoroscopy.Excessive force against resistance may result in damage to the catheter or vessel/organ." at this time it is not possible to assign a definitive root cause for the event as reported.Based on the evidence presented by the returned sample and the information provided by the supporting documentation, clinical and/or procedural factors appear to have impacted on the event as reported.
|