• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS VITROS IMMUNODIAGNOSTIC PRODUCTS TROPONIN I ES REAGENT PACK; IN-VITRO DIAGNOSTIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS VITROS IMMUNODIAGNOSTIC PRODUCTS TROPONIN I ES REAGENT PACK; IN-VITRO DIAGNOSTIC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 6802301
Device Problem Incorrect Or Inadequate Test Results (2456)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 12/19/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation determined that discordant vitros tropi es results were obtained from multiple samples from a single patient when compared to an alternative vitros troponin reagent lot and to a non-vitros method processed on a vitros eci immunodiagnostic system.The customer did not provide any historical quality control results; however, the customer reported that qc fluid performance over the testing period was acceptable; therefore, a vitros tropi es reagent issue is unlikely.As the results were consistently high over a two week period and there was no indication that any other patient samples were affected, a calibration or instrument issue is unlikely to be a contributing factor.The most likely assignable cause of the discordant vitros tropi es results is a sample interferent such as human anti mouse antibody (hama) or heterophilic antibody.
 
Event Description
A customer observed discordant vitros tropi es results from multiple samples from a single patient when compared to an alternative vitros troponin reagent lot and to a non-vitros method, processed using a vitros troponin i es reagent in combination with a vitros eci immunodiagnostic system.Patient results 10.1, 19.2, 26.2, 21, 20.9, 16.6, 19.8, 13.7, 22, 13, 11, 17, 14.8, 11.8, 15.3, 15.3, 18.2, 1.68, 1.95, 2.7, 1.91, 2.04, 1.75, 2.18, 3.45 versus expected result 0.01 ng/ml determined by a non-vitros method.Biased results of the direction and magnitude observed may lead to inappropriate physician action if undetected.The discordant results were reported outside of the laboratory and the customer stated that medication was administered based on these results.Ortho has not been made aware of any allegation of patient harm.This report is number two of two mdr¿s for this event.Two 3500a forms are being submitted for this event as two devices were involved.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VITROS IMMUNODIAGNOSTIC PRODUCTS TROPONIN I ES REAGENT PACK
Type of Device
IN-VITRO DIAGNOSTIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS
100 indigo creek drive
rochester NY 14626
Manufacturer (Section G)
ORTHO CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS
felindre meadows
pencoed
bridgend, wales CF35 5PZ
UK   CF35 5PZ
Manufacturer Contact
james a stevens
100 indigo creek drive
rochester, NY 14626
5854533000
MDR Report Key7205757
MDR Text Key98189878
Report Number3007111389-2018-00008
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MMI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,o
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/19/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/19/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/24/2018
Device Catalogue Number6802301
Device Lot Number2650
Other Device ID Number10758750002504
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received01/05/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/22/2017
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
-
-