• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES; REPLACEMENT HEART VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES; REPLACEMENT HEART VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number 2900
Device Problems Degraded (1153); Torn Material (3024)
Patient Problems Aortic Regurgitation (1716); Aortic Valve Stenosis (1717)
Event Date 01/01/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Although bioprosthetic valves have been proven to have excellent long term durability, failure does occur in a small number of valves.Replacement of a bioprosthetic valve over time is more likely due to structural valve deterioration (svd) which occurs as a result of stenosis (from calcification or host tissue overgrowth), dehiscence, fibrosis or non-calcific degeneration.Stenosis, which develops progressively over time, can be due to a number of issues.Additionally, there can be a number of potential known and unknown patient related contributing factors.Svd, a common reason for bioprosthesis explant or reoperation, encompasses multiple failure modes, including calcific and non-calcific degeneration, dehiscence, cusp thickening or fibrosis, or a combination of these.Such failure modes, occurring singularly or concomitantly, may contribute to stenosis and/or regurgitation.Alternatively, nonstructural dysfunction (nsvd) may also play a role in the development of valvular stenosis.The device was not returned for evaluation, as it remained implanted.Therefore, the root cause for the degeneration, tear, regurgitation, and stenosis remains indeterminable.However, it is likely that patient related factors and the progression of the underlying valvular disease pathology contributed to the event.The device history record (dhr) was not able to be reviewed as the device serial number was not provided.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event Description
Edwards received notification that this (b)(6) year-old patient with an unknown 27 mm pericardial aortic valve showed degeneration, leaflet tear, stenosis, and regurgitation approximately five (5) year after the implant.The patient was hospitalized due to an episode of heart failure due to this failing valve and a semi-urgent valve in valve procedure was successfully performed with a 29mm transcatheter valve.The patient was expected to be discharged the following day.It was also reported that the patient had possible endocarditis, although vegetations were never seen, four months after initial implant of the 27 mm pericardial valve.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional manufacturer narrative: supplemental report was submitted to include the device information that was received and the dhr review.Updated device manufacture date.The device history record (dhr) was reviewed and showed that this device met all manufacturing and sterilization specifications for product release prior to distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
REPLACEMENT HEART VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
MDR Report Key7221658
MDR Text Key98347968
Report Number2015691-2018-00281
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DYE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/26/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/27/2016
Device Model Number2900
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/27/2018
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age64 YR
-
-