Same case as mdr id# 2134265-2018-00181.It was reported that partial deployment of stent occurred.The target lesion was located in the carotid artery.A 10.0-24mm carotid wallstent¿ was advanced to treat the lesion.However, when the stent was placed in the lesion and re-captured after initial deployment, the distal portion of the deployed stent did not protrude out of the sheath to re-capture.The device was completely removed from the patient.A 10.0-37mm carotid wallstent¿ was advanced through the sheath; however, while passing the guide catheter, the distal portion of the stent was bent and no further progress was made.The entire stent was removed and a 9x4 / 135mm carotid wallstent¿ was used and completed the procedure.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status was good.
|
Describe event or problem, device code, device evaluated by mfr., eval summary attached, method codes, result codes, and conclusion codes updated.Age at time of event corrected from (b)(6).(b)(4).Device evaluated by mfr.: the device was received with the stent partially deployed on the delivery device.A significant quantity of dried blood was observed at the distal end of the device.The stent wires at the distal end of the stent were noted to be twisted prior to investigator attempting to deploy the stent.The investigator was unable to deploy the stent and the proximal outer broke approximately at the base of the shrink tubing as the investigator was attempting to deploy.The stent was deployed by cutting the distal outer and pulling the tip distally while gripping the stent outer.The stent was visually and microscopically examined.No issues were identified.A visual inspection of the stent holder identified no issues.The imprinted stent impression was clearly evident on the stent holder.Dried blood was evident on both the stent holder and the inner.A visual and tactile inspection of the device identified no issues along the length of the device.No other issues were identified during the product analysis.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The investigation conclusion is operational context as the product meets the design and manufacture specification but due to anatomical/procedural factors encountered during the procedure, performance was limited.(b)(4).
|