Evaluation summary: a device history review revealed no discrepancies that may have contributed to a complaint of this failure mode.All quality assurance testing performed during manufacturing was acceptable.The quality assurance review of the visual, physical and dimensional evaluation results indicated that the product met specification requirements.All dhr are reviewed for accuracy prior to product release.Sample consisted in one catheter used came inside a generic plastic bag.Visual evaluation of the sample reveals signs of use (residues of blood).Visual inspection was performed and it was observed that the arterial extension has a hole/cut and present marks that indicate the use of some instrument.Manufacturing performs 100% visual inspection, 100% leak test and qa in process inspection.The reported condition has been confirmed.The physical sample involved in the reported incident was returned for evaluation.Based on the testing evaluation, it can be concluded that the device functioned as intended for an undetermined amount of time.100% devices are inspected for leaks or cuts in the extensions.The most probable root cause can be considered as misuse; this defect was more likely damaged during use caused due to the use of strong cleaning agents, sharp object, excessive force during of use and repeated clamping or other similar damage.The evidence provided is enough to discard the manufacturing process as a potential cause.No tre nds or triggers have been found.No action is deemed necessary at this time.It must be noted that in-process controls are in place to prevent nonconforming product from leaving the manufacturing operations.This complaint will be used for tracking and trending p urposes.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|