The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The manufacturer has received the sample and will evaluate.Results are expected soon.A lot history review (lhr) of rebr1214 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
|
The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, frequency analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint that the stent moved was confirmed and it appeared that the movement was inadvertently caused during use.One repair segment was returned for investigation.The metal stents were positioned at the distal end of the repair segment.The distal tip of the larger stent was positioned approximately 1mm distal to the tip of the smaller stent.A red colored residue was observed on the metal stents.Tears were observed in the adhesive fillet at the distal end of the white tubing.Each lumen of the repair segment was patent to infusion and the metal stents did not move during infusion.The condition of the returned sample suggests that the catheter was damaged during use.The product ifu states, ¿note: if the replacement segment is to be cut to desired length, the splice connector stent can be removed and reinserted.¿ a lot history review (lhr) of rebr1214 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
|