|
Catalog Number 400SMTHXSFT0102 |
Device Problems
Kinked (1339); Failure to Advance (2524); Physical Resistance (2578)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 01/15/2018 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Results: the pusher assembly was retracted so that the pusher mid-joint was stuck inside the introducer sheath friction lock.The pusher assembly was kinked along its proximal length and just proximal to the introducer sheath conclusions: evaluation of the returned smart coil revealed the pusher was retracted such that it became stuck inside the introducer sheath friction lock.The friction lock inner diameter (id) is smaller than the rest of the introducer sheath, which allows the introducer sheath to properly seat on the pusher assembly mid-joint.If the pusher assembly mid-joint is forcefully withdrawn beyond the introducer sheath friction lock, it is likely that resistance will be experienced upon attempting to advance the coil.Further evaluation revealed kinks along the proximal pusher assembly and just proximal to the introducer sheath.The distal kink was likely a result of forcefully gripping and advancing the coil against resistance.The other kinks were likely due to packaging for return to penumbra.Additional kinks were created by the penumbra investigator during functional analysis also.Penumbra coils are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the internal carotid artery (ica) using penumbra smart coils (smart coils).During the procedure, the physician successfully deployed and detached eight smart coils using a non-penumbra microcatheter.The physician then felt resistance advancing another smart coil out of its introducer sheath and into the hub of the microcatheter.The hospital staff attempted to forcefully advance the smart coil, and consequently the pusher wire of the smart coil became kinked.The smart coil was therefore removed, and the procedure was then completed using two new smart coils and the same microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|