After a cage was inserted (l5-s1), final x-ray indicated the cage split.The surgeon removed the posterior portion of the cage, leaving anterior portion in the disc space.All fragments were successfully retrieved and there were no delays or adverse health consequences to the patient.
|
Method: device history review, complaint history review, risk assessment; result: the reported event of was confirmed via email correspondence with the sales rep.The device was not returned.The explanted posterior portion was discarded by the hospital.The anterior portion is still implanted.Manufacturing history review was performed on the reported lot# no manufacturing related issue was found.Conclusion: the root cause of the reported event cannot be determined due to lack of information.Following are the potential factors that might be leading to the intra-op fractures.Thickness of wall adjacent to lateral window.Size of lateral window.User overestimating strength of implant and applying excessive force (torsional, cantilever).Not following surgical technique guide; using oversized implant or wrong type/size of inserter, not distracting when inserting or repositioning, use of ¿twist & distract¿ method.
|
After a cage was inserted (l5-s1), final x-ray indicated the cage split.The surgeon removed the posterior portion of the cage, leaving anterior portion in the disc space.All fragments were successfully retrieved and there were no delays or adverse health consequences to the patient.
|